I saw the first episode of "Glee"
Jan. 19th, 2010 12:37 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And am puzzled.
Perhaps because I am not American, this seems like a replication of every single high school drama ever?
Barring Degrassi which was Canadian and Buffy which mocked high school more than anything.
I mean the songs were good, very talented peeps.
But really? The clump of over done stereotypes is America's top show. I'm not judging anyone who watches it, god knows the stuff I like is considered trash, but really?
Where is the New-ness?
Where am I seeing something that is a little different?
I'll probably view the series, because I can see other members of my family are utterly smitten, but really?
One's inner conflict is by being both a jock and a glee club singer?
Also, why is every female character obsessing over something and it's made to seem dysfunctional? Why is the football coach not taking "No" for an answer when the teacher with OCD rejects him? Why is Jane Lynch constantly type cast as the mannish coach?!
Why is everyone so mean to Artie!? The kid in the wheelchair, the only thing he is, is the geeky kid in the wheelchair.
Again, perhaps because the notion of cliques and this type of stratification of social circles isn't something I've actually experienced and it all seems to be this imaginary and fantastical Jungian thing... it all seems a bit much.
Help me here US friends, is high school really like that? Or is this also Buffy-esque and the monsters are instead simply exaggerated stereotypical roles?
As an aside, my mom told me not to read too much into it. At which point I laughed me EVIL LAUGH! Mwahahahaha.
Perhaps because I am not American, this seems like a replication of every single high school drama ever?
Barring Degrassi which was Canadian and Buffy which mocked high school more than anything.
I mean the songs were good, very talented peeps.
But really? The clump of over done stereotypes is America's top show. I'm not judging anyone who watches it, god knows the stuff I like is considered trash, but really?
Where is the New-ness?
Where am I seeing something that is a little different?
I'll probably view the series, because I can see other members of my family are utterly smitten, but really?
One's inner conflict is by being both a jock and a glee club singer?
Also, why is every female character obsessing over something and it's made to seem dysfunctional? Why is the football coach not taking "No" for an answer when the teacher with OCD rejects him? Why is Jane Lynch constantly type cast as the mannish coach?!
Why is everyone so mean to Artie!? The kid in the wheelchair, the only thing he is, is the geeky kid in the wheelchair.
Again, perhaps because the notion of cliques and this type of stratification of social circles isn't something I've actually experienced and it all seems to be this imaginary and fantastical Jungian thing... it all seems a bit much.
Help me here US friends, is high school really like that? Or is this also Buffy-esque and the monsters are instead simply exaggerated stereotypical roles?
As an aside, my mom told me not to read too much into it. At which point I laughed me EVIL LAUGH! Mwahahahaha.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:40 pm (UTC)More generally, I think that some of the appeal is supposed to be that all of the characters are such stereotypes and yet drop it all to spontaneously burst into song.
As for whether high school is actually like that, mine certainly wasn't, by my high school wasn't exactly typical.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 12:25 am (UTC)tribesgangsclanscliques, and they often were stereotyped. Probably because people believed they had to live up to them. There was a lot of piss-poor behavior and general bullshit. High school sucked. Don't know what your experience was but am curious to know ... a professor of mine said her high school in France was very homey and everyone looked out for each other, which made me wonder if it's only American high schools that are (sometime literally) war zones.no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:45 am (UTC)I haven't seen it, but I have friends who are in love with it. I have one friend who loves it who told me that she found the first episode or two kind of offensive in its stereotyping and tokenization, but it got better. I've also read critiques that say it doesn't. I'm fairly agnostic, having never seen it, but it doesn't look like something I want to go out of my way to watch. I added it to my Hulu queue, but it's just not happening.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 09:55 am (UTC)Plus its very very queer. Which for a primetime show on Fox? Is quite an achievement.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 08:06 am (UTC)I don't think I've ever seen a realistic representation of high school in a mainstream production. A lot of people think My So-Called Life was the most realistic drama about American teenagers; I wasn't a huge fan at the time, but I might enjoy it more now if i watched it again.
Glee has just started in the UK, and here's an article attempting to explain its appeal to a non-American audience: http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2010/jan/09/glee-guardian-guide-feature There's also a link to an interview with Jane Lynch, who is very funny on the show, and out.
All that said, I do enjoy Glee, partially for the comfort factor, partially the humour and partially the music and choreography. It's escapist entertainment and I'm ok with that. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 11:36 pm (UTC)A certain amount of the cliquing up happens in the breakdown of who picks what electives to fulfill which requirement. Did you take ROTC or PE? Did you take film or music or drama for performing arts? Did you take algebra 1 in your freshman year? Or were you already in trig by that time? Which "world history" class did you take? etc.
The next layer of division comes from what you do in terms of extracurricular activities. Here you get Glee club, chess club, French club versus any sport, as an example.
As for the show? I think that it gets better as the characters become more defined. That said, it does take the stereotypes and push them a little too hard, maybe. The evil cheerleading coach in particular. As the show progresses, most of the characters become less one dimensional and more interesting. It wasn't quite enough to hold my interest for more than about a half a season, though.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 03:38 pm (UTC)As for "Glee" - its what passes as muse around here. It has music and its enjoyable, and that translates into "uniqueness" I guess. I don;t know anyone who seriously cares for it except as a background thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-12 01:41 am (UTC)As you get further into the show, despite all the "we are taking ourselves seriously" sort of drama, it is very tongue-in-cheek. Part of it is visual, with the overly-saturated colors and bright, wet-paint artifice of the entire set, but it's mostly within the acting and dialogue.
The only thing that vaguely makes me uncomfortable is the ableism. The show is ableist while attempting to expose ableism and criticize it. Artie's character is fleshed out more, although it's mostly through the "kid in the wheelchair" angle. He's a good character, well-acted and likable, and there's nothing overtly offensive about the way he's portrayed. Artie is not the only disabled character in the show, but Artie is the only one who really gets any screentime.