Bombs Away

Dec. 25th, 2007 11:26 am
eumelia: (Default)
[personal profile] eumelia
Anybody who served (or followed the News) in Lebanon War II knows that Cluster bombs were employed by the IDF over Lebanon.
Those who know what Cluster bombs are all about (if you don't Google it, like everything else to do with weapons there's a lot of info online about it) should be aware that undetonated "bomblets" are either dudds or sleepers that act like land-mines, no need to explain what a land-mine is.

I thought the investigation about the use of Cluster bombs was redundant, because unlike the use of land-mines, which are illegal, Cluster bombs are not illegal under international law.
Just immoral.
And as we all know, morality touches very little on legality when it comes to International law, which is generally about whatever you do inside your own borders is fine, just don't bother us about it.
Seeing as the bombs were dropped outside Israel... well, you know the rest.

Ynet News is defensive about the use of Cluster bombs. And as usual BBC News has no problems with being morally "superior".

I remember when my officer first spoke to me during my service about the weapons in our arsenal and I studied Cluster Bombs I asked her "Isn't this like dropping land-mines on people" - in my 18 year old innocence.
And she said "That's exactly what it is".
"And this is allowed?"
"It's not illegal"
"That's horrible"
"Yes it is"
And we moved on.

Morals and Ethics have very little place in any army. They should.
But they don't.
But so long as no War Time Laws are broken, what difference does it make what the aftermath is.

13:31 - Edited to Add: This what Israel.Indymedia has to say about the Cluster Bomb findings.

13:41 - Edited to Add: Someone else with an opinion - it's in Hebrew over at Friends of George.

Date: 2007-12-25 10:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schemingreader.livejournal.com
See, on some level you are expecting Israeli society to have the concept of tohar ha-neshek.

Even though I usually try to avoid reading about this stuff, on some level I'm incredibly relieved to read you being upset about this, because it means that there are still Israelis who believe in basic values.

Date: 2007-12-25 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com
I do expect that because, it's what the IDF had been spouting on for the last 40 years, which everyone knew on some level wasn't true and Lebanon II just brought it home for lots of us.

I'm usually more vitriolic when it comes to the ethics and morality of the IDF, but I can't seem to get the outrage I'm looking for, since the outrage I spouted over the Lebanon War is already written it just seemed like a waste of energy to get riled up again.
Which for me is a good thing, because it means I'm not taking everything the army does personally anymore.

as the evil lawyer chimes in...

Date: 2007-12-25 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tempestbreaker.livejournal.com
Ah cluster bombs. My professor for international law, Jules Lobel, we suspect was gearing up for a case involving cluster bombs (With the group "Center for Constitutional Rights", a civil rights/human rights legal advocacy group). As such, he split the class up and assigned us different issues regarding cluster bombs. Other students got questions regarding liability of manufacturers/Israel. My topic was regarding the legality of cluster bombs themselves.
So if you're interested, I have prepared a nice bit of legal analysis regarding cluster bombs. My conclusion? Cluster bombs are not per se illegal. Properly functioning ones are fine. The problem as I'm sure you can guess is that cluster bombs with a propensity to malfunction (20% dud rate or higher) DO violate international law. Hehe. If you're interested/have the time/patience, I'd be more than happy to send you my work to read. Just let me know.
(I aced the course so I'm assuming it's decent legal research :) )

Re: as the evil lawyer chimes in...

Date: 2007-12-26 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daemonfall.livejournal.com
I would very much like to see that research :)

Re: as the evil lawyer chimes in...

Date: 2007-12-26 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tempestbreaker.livejournal.com
I'd be glad to show you my research. However, you must first let me know that you're not taking anything I have written as legal advice in any shape or form, but rather just the product of an academic exercise. Oh look! I'm covering my butt to avoid any potential liability!
Groovy with that?

Re: as the evil lawyer chimes in...

Date: 2007-12-26 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daemonfall.livejournal.com
Sweet :)
I've heard the lecture about war-laws in the officer's school, but I hope to see some more advanced ideas about it.

Date: 2007-12-26 06:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daemonfall.livejournal.com
Moral and ethics have very little place in an army that wishes to win any kind of large scale war. This sad notion was proved over and over in most conflicts I had the displeasure to review. However, POLICE has every need possible for morality and ethical mechanisms. The IDF, for lack of better bodies in israel, fills two roles instead of just one, it fills the role of the Army with it's amount of heavy weaponry and tactics and amoral disposition to life in general.
But this conflicts with the fact that the IDF is also a police of sorts, used to regulate large-scale societies. This duplicity hinders both aspects of the military, and since morality is harder to teach then military disregard for life, that's what you get.

Profile

eumelia: (Default)
Eumelia

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

V and Justice

V: Ah, I was forgetting that we are not properly introduced. I do not have a name. You can call me V. Madam Justice...this is V. V... this is Madam Justice. hello, Madam Justice.

Justice: Good evening, V.

V: There. Now we know each other. Actually, I've been a fan of yours for quite some time. Oh, I know what you're thinking...

Justice: The poor boy has a crush on me...an adolescent fatuation.

V: I beg your pardon, Madam. It isn't like that at all. I've long admired you...albeit only from a distance. I used to stare at you from the streets below when I was a child. I'd say to my father, "Who is that lady?" And he'd say "That's Madam Justice." And I'd say "Isn't she pretty."

V: Please don't think it was merely physical. I know you're not that sort of girl. No, I loved you as a person. As an ideal.

Justice: What? V! For shame! You have betrayed me for some harlot, some vain and pouting hussy with painted lips and a knowing smile!

V: I, Madam? I beg to differ! It was your infidelity that drove me to her arms!

V: Ah-ha! That surprised you, didn't it? You thought I didn't know about your little fling. But I do. I know everything! Frankly, I wasn't surprised when I found out. You always did have an eye for a man in uniform.

Justice: Uniform? Why I'm sure I don't know what you're talking about. It was always you, V. You were the only one...

V: Liar! Slut! Whore! Deny that you let him have his way with you, him with his armbands and jackboots!

V: Well? Cat got your tongue? I though as much.

V: Very well. So you stand revealed at last. you are no longer my justice. You are his justice now. You have bedded another.

Justice: Sob! Choke! Wh-who is she, V? What is her name?

V: Her name is Anarchy. And she has taught me more as a mistress than you ever did! She has taught me that justice is meaningless without freedom. She is honest. She makes no promises and breaks none. Unlike you, Jezebel. I used to wonder why you could never look me in the eye. Now I know. So good bye, dear lady. I would be saddened by our parting even now, save that you are no longer the woman I once loved.

*KABOOM!*

-"V for Vendetta"

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 10:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios