eumelia: (Default)
Eumelia ([personal profile] eumelia) wrote2006-06-14 01:33 pm

Gender Schmender

Disclaimer: This post was inspired by this post over at [livejournal.com profile] hagar_972 , who in turn was inspired by this post over at [livejournal.com profile] nurint which started a really big discussion.

Seriously look at the title.
That's what I think about gender.
Does that mean I don't conform to the basic ideas society has about gender identity, sure I do, same as I conform to the basic idea society has about sexual identity. At least to a certain extent.
Does that mean I agree with it?
Hell no.
Does that mean I am conforming against my will?
Hmmm, maybe? Not conforming sure makes life a whole lot more difficult, and who wants their life more difficult than it already is? Well, me just a little; I wouldn't be going around wearing political buttons and shaving my head to a buzz if I totally conformed to society's idea of a young twenty something woman is.
Then again I could be totally wrong, what is the first thing that pops to mind when you think young twenty something woman? For me, well it's me and my other female friends, but we're all so different, in extreme ways even, but everyone of us is a twenty something young woman who cannot really be mistaken for something else.
What makes me a Woman? Or, since I young and twenty something, a Girl?
Most of the time I don't think about it, I am what I am, it really doesn't matter.
Who it does matter to is to the people who perceive me and it very much does matter to me how I am perceived.
When I was in high school I was in a poetry writing group (many on my f-list know which one I'm talking about) and the group "director", I suppose would be a good word, at the time said something very true when us wishy washy poetry types were talking about identity.
He said (and I paraphrase) - I'm not who I think I am; I'm who I think you think I am.
I still think there is truth in that statement, we are how other people perceive us to be - and so we are boxed into neat little categories of "young woman", "child", "boy" and if we're pushing the envelope a little "transgender", "boi", "grrl"... you get the picture.
And again, no matter how much we push the envelope we are still judged by these perceptions, simply by declaring that we are not exactly how you perceive us to be, because then people switch the label in their head and then their reactions suits the label.
The fact that I've corrected the person from viewing me in a certain way, doesn't change the fact that I now have a different label with which I am perceived.
Is that better or worse?
To identify as a woman or a man, one takes a considerable risk, there are various expectations one must adhere to when one ID's in the binary and woe be it to someone who doesn't conform to these expectations.
And when one decided to consciously shrug off these expectations and ID as something else like Genderqueer. There are expectations from the gender variant as well - they are expected not to conform to any gender, and yet both I know people who are not gender variant and do not conform to these expectations.
I don't think gender is any more complicated than sexuality, but society is still extremely squeaky about gender fluidity.

[identity profile] hagar-972.livejournal.com 2006-06-14 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
"The fact that I've corrected the person from viewing me in a certain way, doesn't change the fact that I now have a different label with which I am perceived.
Is that better or worse?"


Suggesting a slightly different angle: we need names to call things. Names, inevitably, have semantic fields; they're supposed to have semantic fields. If you don't like the semantic field of the name (label) associated with you, then either change the name ("boi") or redefine the semantic field. (Harder, 'cause it's a society/collective thing.)

But we need language to think in, so 'labels' for themselves are all evil. It's more the way each label is used.

[identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com 2006-06-14 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I couldn't agree with you more, but in order to challenge these conventions we need to work within them, or retire from society and create a separatist social order (not that there's anything wrong with that :), but I think at the moment labels are a necessary evil.

By those of my friends who know,

[identity profile] morin.livejournal.com 2006-06-14 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I carry the fluid label "Gender queer". Does it make any difference to you? Does it mean anything, except "not a man and not a woman"? To anyone knowing I'm a female engaged to a male, would it matter if we're a couple of gender-bender-y persons looking to share a life?
Defining yourself, as amorphilly as the definition may be, is hard enough. Sharing it with the world is sometimes too much.

Re: By those of my friends who know,

[identity profile] hagar-972.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
Looks like I need to read on this gender-queer issue. Any good resources?

[identity profile] morin.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Judith Butler was the one who helped me, so I recommend reading her first. She's quite complicated at times, but I'm certain you won't have a problem with that. ;)

[identity profile] hagar-972.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks! I guess another trip to שבוע הספר is due, huh?

[identity profile] morin.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 09:34 am (UTC)(link)
I'm afraid most of her writing wasn't translated. :(

[identity profile] hagar-972.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 09:37 am (UTC)(link)
So just a trip to Steimatzky first chance I get, as Dyonun are down til July.

[identity profile] roie-m.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
Time to stop pretending I know everything better than everyone else.

Here's 100 NIS. Buy me a copy too.

[identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 11:39 am (UTC)(link)
I got an Amazon gift card for my b-day and haven't used it yet, which book of hers would you recommend reading first?

[identity profile] morin.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
First thing's first:
- Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Thinking Gender. New York & London: Routledge, 1990
- Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York & London:Routledge, 1993 (Not all of it is relevant to this discussion, but it's all interesting.)
- Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York & Routledge, 1997 (Very relevant)

Her book about Antigone - that was translated - touches the issue to some extent. If you enjoy her writing, it's very nice. You can also search the web for articles about "Queer theory".

[identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay, thanks!
Which books of hers do you have, so that I may borrow, when I come back, with your permission of course. :)

[identity profile] roie-m.livejournal.com 2006-06-15 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
either change the name ("boi") or redefine the semantic field

I understand what you're saying here, it's also the main reason for Mel and my original misunderstanding: She chooses door number one, I choose door number two.

Maybe it's because I just woke up (insomnia, for those of you who don't know), but I can't put my finger on just why I think my way is better than your way. I'd love to have that discussion sometime.