ext_3425 ([identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] eumelia 2009-05-25 08:33 pm (UTC)

There's a slight (see, big!) difference between speculative fiction (which is what Star Trek is) and historical fiction (which the example that you use).

This Star Trek was a imagining. Being a Stud/Slut doesn't mean that this Kirk had to remain completely straight. It wouldn't have changed the essence of the character, imo, because Kirk wouldn't commit to anyone in any event... in the end it's zero-sum.

But representation is still important.

It would be nice to see other characters get their thing on, but I doubt that will happen, the focus will always be on Kirk and Spock (maybe Bones... but it's not a troika yet... looks to be Uhura this time around).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org